Primary Healthcare to Universal Health Coverage Path – Insights from IIM Bangalore

Explore how India can progress from primary healthcare to universal health coverage path, with insights from IIM Bangalore’s panel discussion on PHC and UHC strategies.

Introduction

India’s healthcare system has long struggled to balance accessibility, affordability, and quality. A recent panel discussion at the Indian Institute of Management Bangalore (IIMB), hosted by the Centre for Public Policy during the XX International Conference on Public Policy & Management, examined this challenge in detail. The discussion focused on how primary healthcare to universal health coverage path can be charted through evidence, governance, and community-led approaches.

Experts, researchers, and policy specialists shared critical insights drawn from states such as Karnataka and Jharkhand, analyzing how performance in primary healthcare (PHC) translates into better outcomes for universal health coverage (UHC). Their findings emphasized the importance of system efficiency, financing, and community participation in ensuring equitable healthcare for all citizens.

This article unpacks the highlights of that discussion, connects it to broader healthcare debates, and examines the actionable strategies India can adopt to strengthen its health system.

Purchase Today

Why Primary Healthcare is Central to the Debate

Primary healthcare is not merely the first point of contact between people and the health system—it is the foundation of any equitable model of care. The IIMB discussion reiterated that without strong PHC, the idea of universal health coverage remains aspirational.

The researchers presented evidence showing that PHC inputs UHC outcomes index comparison can help policymakers understand where health systems perform well and where they lag. For instance:

• PHC Input Domains include infrastructure, trained personnel, governance capacity, and community-based delivery mechanisms.
• UHC Outcomes include reproductive and child health services, management of non-communicable diseases, financial risk protection, and equity of access.

Comparing these domains revealed significant gaps between inputs and outcomes across different states. The results suggest that strengthening PHC is not just about more spending—it is about smarter allocation, accountability, and integrating community perspectives.

The Role of Community Engagement

One of the most striking themes of the panel was the critical role of community engagement in primary healthcare India. Health outcomes are not determined solely by hospitals or doctors, but by how well systems interact with the communities they serve.

Key case studies highlighted include:

• Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHA workers): They serve as vital links between rural communities and health services, particularly in maternal and child health.
• Participatory Learning and Action (PLA): This model involves communities in identifying their health priorities and co-designing solutions.
• Tribal Health Navigators: Piloted in Karnataka, this initiative showed how empowering local tribal representatives improved access to PHC in remote areas.

According to Dr. Rajesh Kumar, a public health specialist at AIIMS, New Delhi, “Community health workers represent the soul of India’s healthcare delivery. Without their involvement, universal health coverage will remain a distant dream.”

This aligns with global findings by the World Health Organization (WHO), which emphasizes people-centered healthcare as essential for UHC.

Insights from the States: Karnataka and Jharkhand

The IIMB research team compared PHC performance and UHC outcomes in Jharkhand and Karnataka. These two states offer contrasting case studies:

• Karnataka has invested heavily in PHC through programs like Ayushman Arogya Mandir. Its integration of tribal health navigator improving PHC access shows how innovation in governance and community participation can yield measurable outcomes.
• Jharkhand, while making progress, still struggles with systemic gaps in infrastructure, financing, and governance capacity. This underlines the need for tailored strategies rather than one-size-fits-all solutions.

The Ayushman Arogya Mandir case study healthcare demonstrated that well-designed state interventions can significantly enhance service delivery. When combined with community involvement, such programs reduce inequities and improve trust in public systems.

Policy Implications and Expert Commentary

The findings of this discussion have deep implications for policymakers, researchers, and public administrators. Three key lessons stand out:

1. Data-Driven Policy Making
   Policymakers must adopt analytical tools such as the PHC input vs UHC outcomes index to identify gaps and prioritize investments.
2. Strengthening Governance and State Capacity
   Effective governance, transparency, and accountability at the district level are essential. Without these, investments in PHC will not translate into improved outcomes.
3. Community-Based Approaches
   Scaling models such as participatory learning and tribal health navigators is crucial. They provide culturally sensitive solutions that traditional systems often overlook.

Prof. Yamini Aiyar, President of the Centre for Policy Research, noted:

“The strength of a healthcare system lies not just in hospitals and doctors but in its ability to listen to communities. India must invest in building that social contract.”

Challenges in Achieving UHC

Despite promising models, India faces significant hurdles in moving along the primary healthcare to universal health coverage path:

• Unequal Infrastructure: Rural and tribal areas continue to suffer from lack of facilities.
• Human Resource Shortages: Trained medical personnel are scarce in many districts.
• Financial Risk Protection: Out-of-pocket expenditure remains high, pushing millions into poverty.
• Systemic Inefficiencies: Fragmented programs and overlapping responsibilities dilute impact.

Addressing these requires not just money, but innovative strategies that bridge the gap between policy and practice.

Opportunities for the Future

The discussion also pointed to opportunities India can seize:

• Digital Health Platforms: Leveraging telemedicine and e-health to extend PHC services.
• Public-Private Partnerships: Collaborations with tech and healthcare providers can accelerate solutions.
• Capacity Building Programs: Strengthening local governance and equipping ASHA workers with new skills.
• Community-Led Models: Expanding successful initiatives like PLA and tribal health navigators.

Linking with Learning Resources

For students, researchers, and aspirants preparing for civil services or health policy careers, understanding these debates is vital. To strengthen preparation:

• Explore NCERT courses for foundational learning.
• Stay updated with current affairs relevant to healthcare policies.
• Revise with structured notes and practice MCQs based on health governance.
• Watch explanatory videos for better conceptual clarity.
• Check updated syllabus and download free NCERT PDFs.

For schools or educational institutions looking to build digital learning infrastructure, Mart Ind Infotech offers reliable solutions.

Conclusion

The IIM Bangalore panel has highlighted that India’s progress on the primary healthcare to universal health coverage path depends not just on increased spending but on smarter strategies that balance state capacity with community engagement. By scaling initiatives like Ayushman Arogya Mandir, participatory learning, and tribal health navigators, India can create a more inclusive healthcare system.

The ultimate message is clear: universal health coverage is achievable only when primary healthcare becomes the backbone of the system, designed with people at its core.

FAQs

Q1. What does primary healthcare to universal health coverage path mean?
It refers to the process of strengthening primary health services as the foundation for achieving universal health coverage in India.

Q2. What is PHC inputs UHC outcomes index comparison?
It is a framework to compare the quality of primary healthcare inputs with actual health outcomes under universal health coverage.

Q3. Why is community engagement in primary healthcare India important?
Community involvement ensures culturally relevant, accessible, and sustainable healthcare delivery.

Q4. How does a tribal health navigator improving PHC access help?
They bridge the gap between tribal communities and health services, improving access and trust.

Q5. What is the Ayushman Arogya Mandir case study healthcare about?
It is an initiative in Karnataka that integrates PHC services and strengthens access to healthcare at the community level.

Q6. Which states were highlighted in the IIM Bangalore panel research?
Jharkhand and Karnataka were compared for their PHC performance and UHC outcomes.

Q7. What role do ASHA workers play in India’s healthcare system?
They serve as crucial community health workers linking rural populations to essential health services.

Q8. What challenges does India face in achieving UHC?
Challenges include weak infrastructure, shortage of human resources, and high out-of-pocket expenditure.

Q9. How can digital health strengthen PHC in India?
Telemedicine and digital health platforms can expand access to care, especially in rural and underserved regions.

Q10. What policy lessons emerged from the IIMB discussion?
The key lessons were the need for data-driven policies, stronger governance, and community-based healthcare models.